Page 40 - ECOlogic Book
P. 40

population.  It is out of this stunning realization on the part of many
               ecologists that the field of Ekistics is emerging.


               Despite these new developments, many ecologists are still stuck in
               mechanism.  Given the mechanistic underpinnings of modern science, this is
               not surprising.  “Systems theory has enabled those wedded to mechanism to
               envision far more complex machines, replete with all manner of feedback
                        37
               loops,”  says Cobb.  Trained in a world view that denies to nature all
               experience of subjectivity, it it’s still inconceivable to most scientists that

               such qualities as self-determination or purpose might be inherent in any
               natural form, or to go even further, in the most elementary physical units.
               As one examines the historic development of modern science, an irony
               appears.  Cobb describes this in his essay, “Ecology, Science, and Religion:”
               “The emergence of a mechanistic view of nature which denied to nature any
               purpose, capacity for self-movement, or interiority, was not a necessity of
               science.  At least in part, it was designed to support theological voluntarism,
               the idea that the transcendent God imposes ‘His’ will be fiat upon the world.”
               38


               Some ecologists are now saying that, “We will not have a true science of
                                                                           39
               ecology until this mechanistic view is overcome,”  and there is now
               emerging a more qualitative understanding of this word “relationship” (which
               is what ecologists study).  The key phrase is internal relationships, implying
               that each entity, human or otherwise, has at its core a way of connecting up

               with other entities; a desire, and impetus, an inner radiance.  Thomas Berry
               talks about this “interiority” as a numinous aspect in each being; an ever-
               increasing awakening and intelligibility.  This quality, Berry asserts,
               permeates the universe.  There is nothing in the universe that doesn’t
               express it.  To know this is to relate with other beings from a state of
               comprehensive reverence.  Modern scientific analysis, whose cornerstone is
               objectivity, and the technological manipulations it gives birth to, violate this






               37       Ibid.

               38       Ibid.

               39       Ibid.

                                                             40
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45