Page 7 - ECOlogic Book
P. 7

Breath of Gaia
                                                       (Spring, 1990)


               Although some scientists remain unconvinced, the Gaia Hypothesis has been
               steadily gaining favor in the scientific community.  A much larger segment of
               the population has been startled by Earth scientist James Lovelock’s idea
               into important new awareness.  The Gaia idea, taken from the name for
               Greek Earth goddess, presents us with a deeper perception of the place of
               the human with the Gaian system.  In Lovelock’s words:

                       The entire range of living matter on Earth, from whales to viruses, and
                       from oaks to algae, could be regarded as constituting a single living
                       entity, capable of manipulating the Earth’s atmosphere to suit its
                       overall needs and endowed with faculties and powers far beyond those
                       of its constituent parts.1
                                                    1

               The breath of Gaia is our breath.  As we breathe, with no thought or effort at
               all, we are aiding in the circulation of vital gases throughout the entire
               planet.  It is as if a giant symphony is constantly being played – a symphony
               consisting of opossum breath, ant breath, white pine breath, human breath,
               horse breath, sunflower breath – all adding up to one big breath: Gaia
               breath.  This symphony plays on and we participate in it, not by some
               choice, but because we are part of the orchestra, like it or not.

               In an article which appeared in the February, 1989 issue of Earth First,
               cultural ecologist David Abram insists that this one undeniable fact – the fact
               of how intricately we are woven into the Gaian system through the simple
               act of berating – is challenging our assumptions about human perception.

               “Traditionally,” he said, “perception has been taken to be a one-way
               process.  I, the human, - (the subject), gather data from the surrounding
               environment (or object).  My senses register these discrete bits of data and
               the nervous system figures out what it all means, through an internal
               “representation”.  Within this classic account, Abram says, “meaning and
               value are assumed to be secondary, derivative phenomena; . . . external
               facts . . . have no meaning in themselves.”

               The external world,” he goes on, “is tacitly assumed to be a collection of
               purely objective things entirely lacking in meaning until organized by the
               ineffable mind.”


               1        Lovelock, J. E., Gaia: a New Look at Life on Earth, Oxford University Press, 1982, P. 9.

                                                              7
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12