Page 103 - ECOlogic Book
P. 103

Describing a 1994 conference sponsored by the National Institute of Health,
               Durnil shared his concern:  “We heard about increasing cancers and
               malformations of the penis and testes.  We heard that women exposed to
               chlorinated organic substances had sons with testicular abnormalities and
               smaller penises that boys of mothers not exposed.  We heard that testicular
               cancer has increased 50% in the past twenty years.             116

               Based on these studies and other information, the International Joint
               Commission (IJC) has recommended to both governments (U.S. and
               Canada) the sunsetting of organochlorines.           117

               Both governments have declined to take action at this time, citing “a lack of
               scientific certainty.”

               Who wants to think about these things?  Not me.  Not you, most likely.  Not
               our government officials, not industrial leaders, not their lobbyists.  Not even
               the IJC.  Yet they had to, when the weight of evidence cascaded before their
               eyes.

               Defending the IJC’s recommendations, Durnil says: Critics often attempt to
               find flaws with individual studies in order to discredit findings and
               conclusions about persistent toxic substances.  While limitations to study
               design may exist, this does not necessarily invalidate the findings and
               conclusions when considered in a weight-of-evidence context.”               118

               The good news is that a month after the news/Free Press article appeared,
               (the one that put me to sleep), a panel of Michigan scientists concluded that
               “Insufficient evidence does not prove lack of potential for harm.”
               (precautionary principle)

               Durnil describes some of the changes in thinking that have taken place: “. . .
               We are now prepared to talk about persistent toxic substances as distinct
               from toxic substances.   We are no longer hung up on or worry about
               definitions of such words as ecosystem, virtual and zero.   We are no longer






               116      Op. Cit., Durnil, P. 81.

               117      Sunsettling:  A comprehensive process to restrict, phase out, and eventually ban the manufacture,
               generation, use, transport, storage, discharge, and disposal of a persistent toxic substance.

               118     Op. Cit., Dr=urnil., P. 89.

                                                             103
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108