Page 32 - ECOlogic Book
P. 32

regulations, the bioregional movement is hard to pin down.  Like an
               ecosystem, the lines of command, communication and accountability are
               diverse and complex; boundaries leaky.  Unlike the structures the Western
               mind has become accustomed to, the structures of bioregionalism are loose
               and non-hierarchical.  We make it up as we go along.  Whether such a
               loosely structured diverse movement can hold together is a fascinating
               question.

               And yet, since its inception in the early ‘80’s the movement appears to be
               gathering strength.  The first North American Bioregional Congress took
               place in Kansas City in 1984.  As of this writing, there have been three more
               congresses since then, each one better attended than the one before.
               Committed to self-organization, the structures of these congresses are loose,
               and yet, they are carefully planned with a kind of organic structure that is
               apparent.  Decisions are made by consensus in much the same way as is
               done in Quaker and Native American communities. In The Poverty of
               Affluence, Paul Wachtel talks of the failure of the idealism of the ‘60’s having
               been due to the failure to create new structures to hold the ideas and value-
               sets that emerged at that time.  Perhaps the “structureless” structure: the
               organic organization of bioregionalism offers just such a structure or form.

               In broad terms, Bioregionalism calls for a radical reshaping of, well,
               everything.  It is, as Stephanie Mills says, “about growing a lifeway”.  Like
               flowing water, it has the potential of transforming the Western mind by
               finding its natural place.  Peter Berg, one of the grandfathers of the
               movement, says that bioregionalism is saving the whole by saving its parts.
               It’s both a cultural phenomenon and a deeply spiritual one.  Jim Dodge
               defines bioregionalism as a “decentralized self-determined mode of social
               organization, a culture predicated upon geological integrities and acting in
               respectful accord; and a society which honors and abets the spiritual
                                                    23
               development of its members.”

               Biological awareness begins when you start asking: Where does my water
               come from?  Where does it go as wastewater? Where does my energy for
               heat come from?  Where is my food grown? What watershed do I live in?

               Like foxhole religion, Judith Plant notes that “community seems to most
               fervently gather around watershed protection activities.  Perhaps this is so
               because water is absolutely fundamental to survival . . . More and more
               people, too, are becoming aware that water does not just flow from the tap,

               23       Dodge, Jim, “Living by Life”, in Home: a Bioregional Reader,  Van Andrus, Christopher Plant, Judith Plant &
               Eleanore Wright, eds., (New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, PA, 1990).

                                                             32
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37